Loading

Disciplinary Reporter Case Digest

Attorney ID 47374
Attorney Name Fuller, Gail  
DBP Docket No. 55 DB 1993
Supreme Court Docket No. 888 D.D. No. 2
County Philadelphia
Disciplinary Counsel Gloria R. Ammons
Counsel for Respondent Pro Se
Decision Date 2003-04-29
Effective Date
Case Digest Petitionerís reinstatement questionnaire was replete with omissions and mistakes. Petitioner failed to list her prior criminal record, including arrests and convictions, on her reinstatement questionnaire. Petitioner failed to list a restitution obligation to the probation department on her questionnaire. Petitioner claimed that she was confused by the prior criminal record question, forgot about the financial obligation and denied any subterfuge. The Disciplinary Board found that Petitioner attempted to minimize her criminal activity; failed to accept full responsibility for her own conduct; failed to come to terms with her actions; and has not demonstrated sincere remorse for her actions.
Rule Violation(s)
Discipline Imposed Reinstatement Denied
Points of Law A Petitioner who has not been rehabilitated during the nine years since her disbarment and who has not accepted full responsibility for her own conduct, does not have the requisite moral qualifications, competency and learning in the law. Further, Petitionerís readmission to the bar would be detrimental to the integrity and standing of the bar and the administration of justice, and subversive of the public interest.
Report/Opinion not available