||Respondent was reciprocally suspended for three months “consistent with” the Opinion and Order of the Supreme Court of Delaware decided September 24, 2009. Matter of I. Jay Katz, 981 A.2d 1133, 2009 WL 3051557 (Del. 2009).
Prior to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s issuance, under Pa.R.D.E. 216(a), of a notice and order to show cause why the identical or comparable discipline should not be imposed, Respondent sent to the Court a letter stating that he had no objection to the imposition of reciprocal discipline. The Court entered the reciprocal order without issuing a notice and order to show cause.