Disciplinary Reporter Case Digest

Attorney ID 0
Attorney Name Anonymous,
DBP Docket No. 24 DB 2004
Supreme Court Docket No.
Disciplinary Counsel John Francis Dougherty
Counsel for Respondent None
Decision Date 2004-10-05
Effective Date 2005-01-18
Case Digest Respondent was convicted in October 2003 of Driving Under the Influence and the Supreme Court directed that the Disciplinary Board initiate proceedings to determine the appropriate degree of discipline warranted by the conviction. After a Hearing Committee took evidence and the parties agreed with the Committee’s conclusion that a Private Reprimand was appropriate the hearing was concluded under abbreviated procedure and that recommendation was made to, and accepted by, the Disciplinary Board. A Private Reprimand was imposed by the Board.
Rule Violation(s) Pa.R.D.E. 203(b)(1)
Discipline Imposed Private Reprimand
Points of Law A first conviction for Driving Under the Influence that is not aggravated by other factors may result in a Private Reprimand.
Report/Opinion not available